next up previous [pdf]

Next: Adaptive multiple subtraction Up: Toy examples Previous: Nonstationary line fitting

Nonstationary deconvolution

lpf
lpf
Figure 8.
Benchmark test of nonstationary deconvolution from Claerbout (2008). Top: input signal, bottom: deconvolved signal using nonstationary regularized regression.
[pdf] [png] [scons]

Figure 8 shows an application of regularized nonstationary regression to a benchmark deconvolution test from Claerbout (2008). The input signal is a synthetic trace that contains events with variable frequencies. A prediction-error filter is estimated by setting $N=2$, $s_1(x)=m(x-1)$ and $s_2(x)=m(x-2)$. I use triangle smoothing with a 5-sample radius as the shaping operator $\mathbf{S}$. The deconvolved signal (bottom plot in Figure 8) shows the nonstationary reverberations correctly deconvolved.

freq
freq
Figure 9.
Frequency of different components in the input synthetic signal from Figure 8 (solid line) and the local frequency estimate from non-stationary deconvolution (dashed line).
[pdf] [png] [scons]

A three-point prediction-error filter $\{1,a_1,a_2\}$ can predict an attenuating sinusoidal signal

\begin{displaymath}
m(x) = \rho^x\,cos(\omega\,x)\;,
\end{displaymath} (8)

where $\omega$ is frequency, and $\rho$ is the exponent factor, provided that the filter coefficients are defined as
$\displaystyle a_1$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle -2\,\rho\,\cos(\omega)\;;$ (9)
$\displaystyle a_2$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle \rho^2\;.$ (10)

This fact follows from the simple identity
$\displaystyle m(x)+a_1\,m(x-1)+a_2\,m(x-2)$ $\textstyle =$    
$\displaystyle \rho^x\,\left[\cos(\omega\,x)-2\,\cos(\omega)\,\cos(\omega\,x-\omega)+\cos(\omega\,x-2\,\omega)\right]$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle 0\;.$ (11)

According to equations 9-10, one can get an estimate of the local frequency $\omega(x)$ from the non-stationary coefficients $b_1(x)=-a_1(x)$ and $b_2(x)=-a_2(x)$ as follows:

\begin{displaymath}
\omega(x) = \arccos\left(\frac{b_1(x)}{2\,\sqrt{-b_2(x)}}\right)\;.
\end{displaymath} (12)

Figure 9 shows frequency of the different components in the input non-stationary signal from Figure 8 and the local frequency estimate using equation 12. A reasonably accurate match between the true nonstationary frequencies and their estimate from nonstationary regression can be observed. The local frequency attribute (Fomel, 2007a) provides a different approach to the same problem.


next up previous [pdf]

Next: Adaptive multiple subtraction Up: Toy examples Previous: Nonstationary line fitting

2013-07-26