An eikonal based formulation for traveltime perturbation with respect to the source location |

As a first test to our formulations, we consider a 2-D model where the velocity changes linearly in the direction of the source perturbation. In this case, the traveltime is described analytically as a function of and and so will the traveltime changes, . Restricting this example to models with change of velocity in the direction of the source perturbation does not limit its generality since changes in the orthogonal direction has no direct influence on the traveltime field.

In the first example, we consider a source perturbation in the
vertical direction in a medium in which the velocity changes linearly
in the vertical direction. Considering source perturbation in the
vertical direction is useful for applications related to datuming and
possibly downward continuation. The linear velocity model is defined
by

Evaluating and and using equation 4 yields:

which is an analytical representation of the change in the traveltime field shape with source depth location for this specific linear model and can be used to predict the traveltime for a source at a different depth. To test equation 16, we use equation 15 to estimate the traveltime using expansion 5 and compare that with the true traveltime for that source. Figure 2 shows this difference for a model with (a) a vertical velocity gradient of 0.5 and (b) a vertical velocity gradient of 0.7 . A 200 meter vertical shift, used here for the source, is typical of corrections applied in datuming among other applications. The errors, as expected, increase with an increase in velocity gradient as zero velocity gradient results in no change in traveltime shape and thus no errors. However, the errors are generally small for both gradients with the maximum value of 0.007 s occurring for the largest offset to depth ratio.

diff2
A color contour plot of the traveltime errors
using the perturbation equation as a function of location ()
for a linear velocity model of with =2000 m/s and a vertical
velocity gradient of 0.5 for (a) and 0.7 for (b). In
both cases, the vertical source perturbation distance is 200
meters. The maximum traveltime errors are (a) 0.004 s and (b) 0.007
s.
Figure 2. |
---|

In the second example, we consider source perturbation laterally in a
medium in which the velocity changes linearly in the lateral
direction. Considering source perturbation in the lateral direction
could be useful for velocity estimation, beam based imaging, and
interpolation applications, and more inline with the objectives of
this study. In this case, the linear velocity model is defined by

diffx2
A color contour plot of the traveltime errors
using the perturbation equation as a function of location ()
for a linear velocity model of with =2000 m/s and a horizontal
velocity gradient of 0.5 for (a) a horizontal source
perturbation of 100 meters and (b) a horizontal source perturbation
distance of 200 meters. The maximum traveltime errors are (a) 0.0005
s and (b) 0.002 s.
Figure 3. |
---|

An eikonal based formulation for traveltime perturbation with respect to the source location |

2013-04-02