Omnidirectional plane-wave destruction |

Dip estimation by OPWD is equivalent to the parameter estimation of the OPWD filter in equation 17. The desired parameters minimize the predictive error:

(18) |

with

(19) |

We solve the above equation set by Newton's search. At each iteration, the increments are calculated from the following linearization:

(20) |

Both and are updated until the residual of OPWD becomes less than a specified tolerance. Similarly to the line-interpolating PWD, when we are solving for and , either Tikhonov's regularization (Fomel, 2002) or shaping regularization (Fomel, 2007) can be applied to obtain a robust estimation.

In order to test the performance of OPWD, we generate a 2D synthetic image in polar coordinates using the following equation:

Structures in this image have constant dip angles along radial directions, but the frequency and magnitude vary with radius. Figure 6a shows a test example with . We apply the first-order ( ) OPWD filter to this test image. With the starting dip , we obtain an estimation result in 10 iterations, as shown in Figure 6b. Obviously, dip estimation by OPWD is effective for both horizontal and vertical structures.

circle,odip,oerr,lerr
An omnidirectional dip estimation example:
(a) test image;
(b) dip angles estimated by the OPWD filter;
(c) estimation error of OPWD;
(d) estimation error of LPWD.
Figure 6. |
---|

We compare the proposed OPWD with LPWD by estimating errors in Figures 6c and 6d. As the test image is noise-free, we do not need to use any smoothing regularization in both of these methods. In this case, the modeling errors are the dominate factor of the final estimating errors. Obviously, the LPWD cannot detect the vertical structure accurately, while the OPWD can.

Omnidirectional plane-wave destruction |

2013-08-09